I'd also note that Suppress Noise in Sharpen AI and Sharpen in DeNoise AI are made as options for users who need minor tweaking that doesn't necessarily require the robust noise reduction of DeNoise AI, and vice versa, but where minor adjustments in another program may prove useful without disrupting the user's workflow with two separate programs. The noise removal and sharpening tools that Studio 2 has are only minor editors that don't use the AI processing models the AI programs have. My question is this how does Studio 2 compare to Denoise as far as noise removal and sharpening?įor wildlife, are we better off with Studio 2, or Denoise + Sharpen?Īs for your question, DeNoise AI and Sharpen AI are definitely more robust and effective for removing noise and sharpening, respectively, than Studio 2. I do not need the creative tools in Studio 2, but the AI Clear seems to work well. My main concern is noise reduction, secondary concern is sharpening. My wife and I are hobbyist wildlife photographers shooting a lot of birds, sometimes in low light with high ISOs.
I need help to determine which Topaz product I need.
After installing the graphics card I asked the tech support guy what the difference is between Denoise & Sharpen VS Studio 2: I had tried Topaz Studio 2 because I heard that it was more resource friendly than Denoise and Sharpen. I put in a GTX 1650 and it runs my trail Denoise and Sharpen just fine. A Topaz tech support guy recommended installing a graphics card and that did the trick. It would take up to 25 minutes to make one adjustment and save the photo. My six year old Dell was struggling so much Denoise it wasn't usable.
0 kommentar(er)
